X10

Represent function type guards in the function type object, rather than in the method def of the base interface

Details

  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

This is the work that remains after XTENLANG-1468. The current code works, but creates too many base interface objects, because every guard requires us to create a new one. We should represent the guards directly in the function type objects, which would let them share the interface object and simplify code generation.

Issue Links

is depended upon by

Task - A task that needs to be done. XTENLANG-2971 Umbrella language/front-end JIRA for X10 2.3.1

  • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
  • Open - The issue is open and ready for the assignee to start work on it.
supercedes

Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. XTENLANG-1468 Function types should be represented directly (not with Fun_0_x)

  • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
David Grove added a comment -

bulk defer of open issues to 2.2.2.

Show
David Grove added a comment - bulk defer of open issues to 2.2.2.
Hide
Permalink
David Grove added a comment -

bulk defer of issues to 2.2.3.

Show
David Grove added a comment - bulk defer of issues to 2.2.3.
Hide
Permalink
David Grove added a comment -

bulk defer of 2.3.0 open issues to 2.3.1.

Show
David Grove added a comment - bulk defer of 2.3.0 open issues to 2.3.1.
Hide
Permalink
David Grove added a comment -

bulk defer to 2.3.2

Show
David Grove added a comment - bulk defer to 2.3.2

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    Igor Peshansky
Vote (0)
Watch (1)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated: