XFire

Support REST services

Details

  • Type: New Feature New Feature
  • Status: Open Open
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Unresolved
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: None
  • Component/s: Core
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    3

Description

Add a RestHandler in addition to a SoapHandler.

  1. Java Source File
    RestHandler.java
    07/May/05 7:20 AM
    4 kB
    Brian Bonner
  2. Java Source File
    RestHandlerTest.java
    07/May/05 7:25 AM
    2 kB
    Brian Bonner
  3. XML File
    restRequest.xml
    07/May/05 7:25 AM
    0.2 kB
    Brian Bonner

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Brian Bonner added a comment -

Dan,

So, I created a RestHandler under the org.codehaus.xfire.rest package extending AbstractHandler similar to SoapHandler, and
I kept the HandlerChain messages intact. I've eliminated the SOAP binding since there really isn't any other binding, and the Can you comment on this?

Also, the SoapHandlerTest only responded that both CheckPointHandlers were invoked. The RestHandlerTest handles this the same way.

Brian

Show
Brian Bonner added a comment - Dan, So, I created a RestHandler under the org.codehaus.xfire.rest package extending AbstractHandler similar to SoapHandler, and I kept the HandlerChain messages intact. I've eliminated the SOAP binding since there really isn't any other binding, and the Can you comment on this? Also, the SoapHandlerTest only responded that both CheckPointHandlers were invoked. The RestHandlerTest handles this the same way. Brian
Hide
Permalink
Dan Diephouse added a comment -

The SOAP binding thing is going away don't worry about that. I will try and finish up my commit tonight, which will probably make it a lot clearer for you.

Can you attach your rest handler?

Show
Dan Diephouse added a comment - The SOAP binding thing is going away don't worry about that. I will try and finish up my commit tonight, which will probably make it a lot clearer for you. Can you attach your rest handler?
Hide
Permalink
Brian Bonner added a comment -

Dan,

I haven't tested the RestHandler except for a RestHandlerTest testcase. I'm still uncertain about a few things. I'll attach it. I'm not guaranteeing anything about it though

Brian

Show
Brian Bonner added a comment - Dan, I haven't tested the RestHandler except for a RestHandlerTest testcase. I'm still uncertain about a few things. I'll attach it. I'm not guaranteeing anything about it though Brian
Hide
Permalink
Brian Bonner added a comment -

RestHandler - this is "tested" using the RestHandlerTest testcase, but has not been put into practice (added per Dan's request).

Show
Brian Bonner added a comment - RestHandler - this is "tested" using the RestHandlerTest testcase, but has not been put into practice (added per Dan's request).
Hide
Permalink
Brian Bonner added a comment -

This is the RestHandlerTest test (and restRequest) based on SoapHandlerTest. I was originally thinking that this would verify that the proper envelope was included around the response (in this case) none.

Show
Brian Bonner added a comment - This is the RestHandlerTest test (and restRequest) based on SoapHandlerTest. I was originally thinking that this would verify that the proper envelope was included around the response (in this case) none.
Hide
Permalink
Matt Raible added a comment -

Is this related to http://netzooid.com/blog/2006/05/22/an-attempt-at-a-rest-programming-model/? Is there a target version # for REST services via XFire?

Show
Matt Raible added a comment - Is this related to http://netzooid.com/blog/2006/05/22/an-attempt-at-a-rest-programming-model/? Is there a target version # for REST services via XFire?
Hide
Permalink
Dan Diephouse added a comment -

Well, I have a prototype on the current xfire version, but its kind of hackish. I'd like to do it for 2.0, which is the celtix/xfire merge, as it has a much more flexible binding architecture. So I think we could see something here in the next 2 months.

Show
Dan Diephouse added a comment - Well, I have a prototype on the current xfire version, but its kind of hackish. I'd like to do it for 2.0, which is the celtix/xfire merge, as it has a much more flexible binding architecture. So I think we could see something here in the next 2 months.

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    Dan Diephouse
Vote (1)
Watch (2)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated: