I was about to post a bug about "Overall coverage" not being calculated if there is no Unit coverage when I found this. Is that expected behavior? I think it leads to odd results if we dont consider a package with only integration testing to have an "overall coverage" number.
sam hendley
added a comment - I was about to post a bug about "Overall coverage" not being calculated if there is no Unit coverage when I found this. Is that expected behavior? I think it leads to odd results if we dont consider a package with only integration testing to have an "overall coverage" number.
Manually tested !