RVM

Fix all javadoc "syntax" errors

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Blocker Blocker
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 3.0
  • Component/s: None
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

Since the nightly regression tests are no longer reporting javadoc errors, we've had quite a few creep into the code base. We should get to 0 javadoc failures for the 3.0 release.

Issue Links

is related to

New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. RVM-117 Publish javadoc as part of nightly builds

  • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
  • Open - The issue is open and ready for the assignee to start work on it.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
David Grove added a comment -

I've reduced it down to half a dozen errors in MMTk that I don't know how to fix. Could you or Steve fix them?

thanks,

--dave

Show
David Grove added a comment - I've reduced it down to half a dozen errors in MMTk that I don't know how to fix. Could you or Steve fix them? thanks, --dave
David Grove made changes -
Field Original Value New Value
Assignee Daniel Frampton [ zyridium ]
Hide
Permalink
Ian Rogers added a comment -

All the remaining warnings are caused by the tag:

@see org.mmtk.plan.SimplePhase#delegatePhase

SimplePhase has no member called delegatePhase.

Show
Ian Rogers added a comment - All the remaining warnings are caused by the tag: @see org.mmtk.plan.SimplePhase#delegatePhase SimplePhase has no member called delegatePhase.
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Frampton added a comment -

I have fixed the delegatePhase errors Ian mentioned.

I am leaving this open because we should running this as part of sanity again. or even pre-commit like checkstyle. Any reason not to?

Show
Daniel Frampton added a comment - I have fixed the delegatePhase errors Ian mentioned. I am leaving this open because we should running this as part of sanity again. or even pre-commit like checkstyle. Any reason not to?
Daniel Frampton made changes -
Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
Hide
Permalink
Ian Rogers added a comment -

RVM-118 captures that javadoc isn't being routinely tested.

Show
Ian Rogers added a comment - RVM-118 captures that javadoc isn't being routinely tested.
Ian Rogers made changes -
Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]
Ian Rogers made changes -
Link This issue is related to RVM-117 [ RVM-117 ]

People

  • Assignee:
    Daniel Frampton
    Reporter:
    David Grove
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: