QDox

Multiple annotations on one field and generics

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 1.6
  • Fix Version/s: 1.8
  • Component/s: None
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

It would seem QDox cannot parse a Java 5 file that has more than one annotation on a field and generics are present.

For example, this will parse fine:

import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlID;
import java.util.List;

public class Person {

    protected List<String> address;

    @XmlID
    protected String name;

    public List<String> getAddress() {
        return address;
    }

    public void setAddress(List<String> address) {
        this.address = address;
    }

    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }

    public void setName(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

But this will fail:

package org.openejb.alt.config.ejb;

import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.XmlJavaTypeAdapter;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.CollapsedStringAdapter;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlID;
import java.util.List;

public class Person {

    protected List<String> address;

    @XmlJavaTypeAdapter(CollapsedStringAdapter.class)
    @XmlID
    protected String name;

    public List<String> getAddress() {
        return address;
    }

    public void setAddress(List<String> address) {
        this.address = address;
    }

    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }

    public void setName(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

.. with this error:

com.thoughtworks.qdox.parser.ParseException: syntax error @[16,38] in file:/Users/dblevins/work/openejb3/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/openejb/alt/config/ejb/Person.java
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.parser.impl.Parser.yyerror(Parser.java:607)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.parser.impl.Parser.yyparse(Parser.java:715)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.parser.impl.Parser.parse(Parser.java:588)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder.addSource(JavaDocBuilder.java:300)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder.addSource(JavaDocBuilder.java:316)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder.addSource(JavaDocBuilder.java:312)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder$1.visitFile(JavaDocBuilder.java:369)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:43)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.walk(DirectoryScanner.java:34)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.directorywalker.DirectoryScanner.scan(DirectoryScanner.java:52)
at com.thoughtworks.qdox.JavaDocBuilder.addSourceTree(JavaDocBuilder.java:366)

Activity

Hide
Paul Hammant added a comment -

double annotations on own seem to be ok with that in Svn presently
generics on own seem to be ok with that in Svn presently
together they make it barf.

See todo_testShouldNotChokeOnDoubleAttributeAnnotationAndGenerics() in AnnotationTestCase

Show
Paul Hammant added a comment - double annotations on own seem to be ok with that in Svn presently generics on own seem to be ok with that in Svn presently together they make it barf. See todo_testShouldNotChokeOnDoubleAttributeAnnotationAndGenerics() in AnnotationTestCase
Hide
Robert Scholte added a comment -

doesn't seem to be a problem anymore on my machine. Don't no if it was resolved earlier or due to one of my fixes. I guess the first one.

Show
Robert Scholte added a comment - doesn't seem to be a problem anymore on my machine. Don't no if it was resolved earlier or due to one of my fixes. I guess the first one.
Hide
Robert Scholte added a comment -

r517 | rfscholte | 2009-01-30 21:23:31 CET

activated test for qdox-101; doesn't seem to fail

Show
Robert Scholte added a comment - r517 | rfscholte | 2009-01-30 21:23:31 CET activated test for qdox-101; doesn't seem to fail

People

Vote (2)
Watch (2)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: