Preon

Cannot omit type prefix

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Open Open
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Unresolved
  • Affects Version/s: 1.1
  • Fix Version/s: None
  • Component/s: Framework
  • Labels:
    None
  • Testcase included:
    yes
  • Number of attachments :
    1

Description

The ommitTypePrefix argument (for @BoundObject, @BoundList) appears to not be wired up to do anything. Too bad, because it sounded like exactly what I needed.

Test case attached. Second test fails.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Darien Hager added a comment -

P.S.: If stuff is going to be refactored anyway, there's a typo: "Omit" has one M.

Show
Darien Hager added a comment - P.S.: If stuff is going to be refactored anyway, there's a typo: "Omit" has one M.
Hide
Permalink
Darien Hager added a comment -

A workaround is to use type instead of types in this test, but it seems like nothing actually reads the ommitTypePrefix setting anyway.

Show
Darien Hager added a comment - A workaround is to use type instead of types in this test, but it seems like nothing actually reads the ommitTypePrefix setting anyway.
Hide
Permalink
Darien Hager added a comment -

Bah, I'm going all over the place today. The "workaround" really just hides the failure and fails in a different way.

Hopefully even if I'm doing everything wrong, my confusion is at least indicative of documentation improvements. (Given how much is scattered around on scribd or out of date, I'm relying a lot on the Javadocs.)

I guess @TypePrefix looks ahead without advancing the position. Does it make sense to be able use @TypePrefix on a class definition?

Show
Darien Hager added a comment - Bah, I'm going all over the place today. The "workaround" really just hides the failure and fails in a different way. Hopefully even if I'm doing everything wrong, my confusion is at least indicative of documentation improvements. (Given how much is scattered around on scribd or out of date, I'm relying a lot on the Javadocs.) I guess @TypePrefix looks ahead without advancing the position. Does it make sense to be able use @TypePrefix on a class definition?
Hide
Permalink
Darien Hager added a comment -

Updated the unit test so that it more-accurately reflects what's going wrong, rather than just my other errors.

Show
Darien Hager added a comment - Updated the unit test so that it more-accurately reflects what's going wrong, rather than just my other errors.

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    Darien Hager
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated: