Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: maven-dependency-tree-1.2
-
Fix Version/s: maven-dependency-tree-2.0
-
Component/s: maven-dependency-tree
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:Maven 3.0, Ubuntu, JDK 6.
-
Testcase included:yes
-
Number of attachments :
Description
(Not sure what the right place to file this is. maven-dependency-tree 1.2 gives MNG as the JIRA component by inheritance.)
mvn dependency:tree on the attached project lists batik-script by way of batik-bridge as expected, but then fails to show batik-js as a dependency of that. If you list batik-script as a direct dependency, batik-js is correctly shown.
Possibly related is that Maven 2.2.1 also fails to find batik-js in MavenProject.getRuntimeArtifacts, so clean package fails, whereas this works fine under Maven 3.0. Yet just running the dependency plugin under M3 does not suffice to pick up this fix, wherever it was - MNG-4690?
Although the Batik JARs are built from an odd source tree, the artifacts as present in the local repository look normal enough; all of the dependencies involved are simple compile scope without exclusions etc.
Marking "major" since this seems to cause MNBMODULE-102 (producing build errors for certain projects); also I have noticed that the dependency graph feature in the NB IDE omits batik-js, and there may be other user-visible effects of this bug.
Issue Links
- is depended upon by
-
MPIR-237
Unexpected download
-
-
MNBMODULE-102
Transitive dependencies incorrectly processed in Maven 3
-
-
MDEP-339
tree mojo doesn't work consistently with maven3
-
-
MENFORCER-140
DependencyConvergence: upgrade maven-dependency-tree dependency to 2.0 for better Maven 3 support
-
The tree calculated by Maven 3.0 core is correct:
.
As mentioned in the compat notes, maven-dependency-tree couldn't be briged onto Aether and this is one of those corner cases where the discrepancy gets visible.