Details
-
Type:
Wish
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 1.3.1
-
Fix Version/s: 1.4
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Number of attachments :
Description
I've run into a case where it would be more concise, not to mention safer, to call out the relocations by include instead of by exclude. It would match the usual pattern if both were supported.
Added in r983242.