Maven 1.x Artifact Plugin

Files are not made group writeable by the scp protocol

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 1.4.1
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

plugin:repository-deploy:
[echo] maven.repo.list is set - using artifact deploy mode
Will deploy to 1 repository(ies): sourceforge-mp
Deploying to repository: sourceforge-mp
Deploying: C:\source\sourceforge\maven-plugins\dbunit\project.xml-->maven-plugins/poms/maven-dbunit-plugin-1.2.pom
Executing command: mkdir -p /home/groups/m/ma/maven-plugins/htdocs/maven//maven-plugins/poms

Executing command: chgrp maven-plugins /home/groups/m/ma/maven-plugins/htdocs/maven//maven-plugins/poms/maven-dbunit-plugin-1.2.pom

Deploying: C:\source\sourceforge\maven-plugins\dbunit\project.xml.md5-->maven-plugins/poms/maven-dbunit-plugin-1.2.pom.md5
Executing command: mkdir -p /home/groups/m/ma/maven-plugins/htdocs/maven//maven-plugins/poms

Executing command: chgrp maven-plugins /home/groups/m/ma/maven-plugins/htdocs/maven//maven-plugins/poms/maven-dbunit-plugin-1.2.pom.
md5

Note: there is no chmod g+w above.

Issue Links

is superceded by

New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. MPARTIFACT-12 property for defining remote repo file permission after upload

  • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.
relates to

Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. MPARTIFACT-29 scpexe does not set permissions

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Mark Church added a comment -

Wouldn't setting a umask of 002 on the server you are deploying too solve this issue with changes to the code?

Show
Mark Church added a comment - Wouldn't setting a umask of 002 on the server you are deploying too solve this issue with changes to the code?
Hide
Permalink
dion gillard added a comment -

Sure it would, but why assume everyone uses umask 002

Show
dion gillard added a comment - Sure it would, but why assume everyone uses umask 002
Hide
Permalink
Carlos Sanchez added a comment -

This causes a problem when deploying to apache cvs repo, files have to be made group writable by hand as SNAPSHOTs can be overwritten by other developer

Show
Carlos Sanchez added a comment - This causes a problem when deploying to apache cvs repo, files have to be made group writable by hand as SNAPSHOTs can be overwritten by other developer
Hide
Permalink
Jörg Schaible added a comment -

MPARTIFACT-29 is the same for scpexe

Show
Jörg Schaible added a comment - MPARTIFACT-29 is the same for scpexe
Hide
Permalink
Brett Porter added a comment -

fixed - will commit later

Show
Brett Porter added a comment - fixed - will commit later

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    dion gillard
Vote (1)
Watch (1)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: