Maven Upload Requests

Transitive dependencies in eclipse jdt core are broken

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Resolution: Won't Fix
  • Labels:
    None

Description

Transitive dependencies in eclipse jdt core are broken. I can MAVENUPLOAD-1795 that the JDT core JAR was uploaded (the version number does not match the actual one in the repo, so maybe that is part of the problem - the repo has 3.3.0-v_771). This JAR has dependencies and transitive dependencies that (quite sensibly) use version ranges. But the ranges do not match any deployed versions of the dependencies, so if you try to use it you get, for example

Caused by: org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.OverConstrainedVersionException: Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0.0,2.0.0)
  org.eclipse.equinox:app:jar:null

There seems to be an issue with the form of the version in the app artifact. It looks like it might match, but clearly doesn't.

Activity

Hide
Carlos Sanchez added a comment -
There are many issues with version ranges and osgi, but that's more of a Maven issue than repository problem
Please refer to the mailing list for questions
Show
Carlos Sanchez added a comment - There are many issues with version ranges and osgi, but that's more of a Maven issue than repository problem Please refer to the mailing list for questions
Hide
Dave Syer added a comment -
Carlos: in my view it is definitely a repository problem if Maven cannot resolve the dependencies for an artifact in the repository. Surely that needs to be fixed, or the artifact removed?
Show
Dave Syer added a comment - Carlos: in my view it is definitely a repository problem if Maven cannot resolve the dependencies for an artifact in the repository. Surely that needs to be fixed, or the artifact removed?
Hide
Brian Fox added a comment -
It is and should have never been allowed in that way, however we can't remove things once they are there, nor change them. So there isn't much to be done here.
Show
Brian Fox added a comment - It is and should have never been allowed in that way, however we can't remove things once they are there, nor change them. So there isn't much to be done here.

People

Vote (2)
Watch (1)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: