Jetty

Provide module for JBoss 7.1.x

Details

  • Type: New Feature New Feature
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Won't Fix
  • Affects Version/s: 8.0.4
  • Fix Version/s: None
  • Component/s: JBoss
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

Currently Jetty provides module only for JBoss 4.x. It would be nice if you could provide module for JBoss 7.1.x. JBoss 7.1.x uses still Tomcat as the servlet container. And Tomcat does not provide support for WebSockets. So using Jetty in JBoss 7.1.x would allow us to use WebSockets with JBoss 7.1.x.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
David Hoffer added a comment -

Yes I too need this feature else I have to deploy a separate container alongside of JBoss that supports WebSockets.

Show
David Hoffer added a comment - Yes I too need this feature else I have to deploy a separate container alongside of JBoss that supports WebSockets.
Hide
Permalink
Maksim Meier added a comment -

Hi David,
take look at this article: http://golovnin.blogspot.de/2012/04/jboss-7-and-websockets.html
It may be a possible solution for you. It works for me. As far as I know Jetty team has abandoned support for Jetty-JBoss module. So don't expect new releases.

Show
Maksim Meier added a comment - Hi David, take look at this article: http://golovnin.blogspot.de/2012/04/jboss-7-and-websockets.html It may be a possible solution for you. It works for me. As far as I know Jetty team has abandoned support for Jetty-JBoss module. So don't expect new releases.
Hide
Permalink
Jan Bartel added a comment -

Maksim and David,

That looks like a good solution. Although, I think you could probably also use the standard jetty deployers (Context and Webapp) to deploy other webapps that use WebSocket (ie be able to use web.xml to define them).

Oh, and Maksim is correct in that we don't intend to support jboss in the future - not unless someone from the community puts their hand up to do it, as its just too much work keeping up with the changing interfaces etc.

Jan

Show
Jan Bartel added a comment - Maksim and David, That looks like a good solution. Although, I think you could probably also use the standard jetty deployers (Context and Webapp) to deploy other webapps that use WebSocket (ie be able to use web.xml to define them). Oh, and Maksim is correct in that we don't intend to support jboss in the future - not unless someone from the community puts their hand up to do it, as its just too much work keeping up with the changing interfaces etc. Jan
Hide
Permalink
Jan Bartel added a comment -

Unless a volunteer is found who has the time to do the integrations, we aren't supporting jboss starting from jetty-8.

Show
Jan Bartel added a comment - Unless a volunteer is found who has the time to do the integrations, we aren't supporting jboss starting from jetty-8.

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    Maksim Meier
Vote (1)
Watch (3)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: