Jetty

AJP13 connections broken with 6.1.26

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Resolved Resolved
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 6.1.27
  • Component/s: None
  • Labels:
    None
  • Environment:
    OpenNMS 1.8.5 with apache 2.2.16
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

When updating OpenNMS to 1.8.6 (git) and it using jetty 6.1.26 (upgaded from 6.1.24) it is no longer possible to use AJP13 connections from apache. Copying Jetty 6.1.24 jars from another installation and downgrading Jetty to 6.1.24 seems to solve the problem

Only changelog I could find that changes AJP code in 6.1.25/.26 is referencing handling of empty packets and ID "327109".

Issue Links

is depended upon by

Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. SONAR-3058 AJP connector is broken in 2.12 (jetty 6.1.26)

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Greg Wilkins added a comment -

mod_jk? or mod_proxy_jk? which versions?

Show
Greg Wilkins added a comment - mod_jk? or mod_proxy_jk? which versions?
Hide
Permalink
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment -

mod_proxy_ajp, apache 2.2.16.

Show
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment - mod_proxy_ajp, apache 2.2.16.
Hide
Permalink
Greg Wilkins added a comment -

I've confirmed a problem with jetty-7. Will fix and then check jetty-6.

Show
Greg Wilkins added a comment - I've confirmed a problem with jetty-7. Will fix and then check jetty-6.
Hide
Permalink
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment -

Much appreciated

Show
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment - Much appreciated
Hide
Permalink
Greg Wilkins added a comment -

I've backed out the 327109 patch and refixed the problem with a different approach.

I've done some manual testing on jetty-6 and jetty-7 and is looking good with mod_proxy_ajp (note that I still prefer mod_proxy_http and it is much faster).

Can you build from source and test?

Show
Greg Wilkins added a comment - I've backed out the 327109 patch and refixed the problem with a different approach. I've done some manual testing on jetty-6 and jetty-7 and is looking good with mod_proxy_ajp (note that I still prefer mod_proxy_http and it is much faster). Can you build from source and test?
Hide
Permalink
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment -

I should be able to, I'll see if I can fit it in tonight. Thanks for getting back so soon.

Show
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment - I should be able to, I'll see if I can fit it in tonight. Thanks for getting back so soon.
Hide
Permalink
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment -

2 minutes of imperical research says this is as good as it was before. Thanks for the quick attention.

Show
Alexander Hoogerhuis added a comment - 2 minutes of imperical research says this is as good as it was before. Thanks for the quick attention.
Hide
Permalink
Michael Gorovoy added a comment -

It appears that Greg has fixed this issue already so marking it as resolved

Show
Michael Gorovoy added a comment - It appears that Greg has fixed this issue already so marking it as resolved

People

  • Assignee:
    Greg Wilkins
    Reporter:
    Alexander Hoogerhuis
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: