History | Log In     View a printable version of the current page.  
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: HAUS-1386
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Blocker Blocker
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Graeme Rocher
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Haus Chores

Grails Fisheye Broken

Created: 30/Nov/06 11:10 AM   Updated: 10/Dec/06 02:50 PM
Component/s: Web
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: short-term

Time Tracking:
Not Specified


 Description  « Hide
Grails' fisheye (http://svn.grails.codehaus.org/) just says that it is scanning the repo and has been for weeks. Last update registered from SVN is on the 11th of oct

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Ben Walding - 30/Nov/06 02:18 PM
I've logged this with Contegix and they're taking a look. Grails causes a lot of problems with FishEye.

Ben Walding - 07/Dec/06 05:02 AM
We have a shiny new build of Fisheye from Cenqua thanks to Cenqua and Contegix.

It is deployed and indexing grails now.


Graeme Rocher - 07/Dec/06 05:09 AM
Thanks Ben!

Ben Walding - 08/Dec/06 02:15 AM
Grails killed our fisheye again, so it's been disabled. Contegix is looking into it.

Ben Walding - 08/Dec/06 05:32 AM
We're going to do some tinkering over the weekend to try and improve performance and hopefully improve the index performance and stability.

Graeme Rocher - 08/Dec/06 07:43 AM
Ok thanks Ben, can't see a reason why Grails would cause a problem, they're only files its seeing surely? Or is it having a problem indexing it?

Ben Walding - 10/Dec/06 01:07 AM
Honestly, who creates copies of their repository in /tags/builds?

We've excluded indexing of tags/builds as it was overwhelming Fisheye.

Grails now fully indexes in 6 minutes instead of 40 hours.


Graeme Rocher - 10/Dec/06 04:55 AM
hmm I don't know why this is happening, the build server is doing it automatically which is operated by canoo. I will find out.

Ben Walding - 10/Dec/06 02:50 PM
You don't have to remove it (unless you want to), Fisheye has been told not to index that section.