| Key: |
GROOVY-2840
|
| Type: |
New Feature
|
| Status: |
Open
|
| Priority: |
Major
|
| Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
| Reporter: |
Mingfai Ma
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
groovy
Created: 19/May/08 06:32 AM
Updated: 19/May/08 06:32 AM
|
|
| Component/s: |
syntax
|
| Affects Version/s: |
1.6-beta-1,
1.5.6
|
| Fix Version/s: |
None
|
|
It would be nice if we could use:
- (3 Unable to render embedded object: File (in [2,3,4]) or (3 not in [2,3,4]) instead of () not found.(3 in [2,3,4]))
- also for instanceof
Remarks:
- It doesn't look like a big issue if it's just "!(x in ['x'])", but when the line is longer and more complex and when use together with other parenthesis, skipping one pair of parenthesis means a lot in code clarity. It's just like in SQL, we can add a NOT to NOT LIKE or NOT IN.
Reference: http://www.nabble.com/Groovy-syntax--API-enhancement-td16796998.html#a16810531
|
|
Description
|
It would be nice if we could use:
- (3 Unable to render embedded object: File (in [2,3,4]) or (3 not in [2,3,4]) instead of () not found.(3 in [2,3,4]))
- also for instanceof
Remarks:
- It doesn't look like a big issue if it's just "!(x in ['x'])", but when the line is longer and more complex and when use together with other parenthesis, skipping one pair of parenthesis means a lot in code clarity. It's just like in SQL, we can add a NOT to NOT LIKE or NOT IN.
Reference: http://www.nabble.com/Groovy-syntax--API-enhancement-td16796998.html#a16810531 |
Show » |
| There are no comments yet on this issue.
|
|
Support "not" for in and instanceof 