GeoTools

NumberRange compile failure in Eclipse Indigo

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 8.0-RC1
  • Fix Version/s: None
  • Component/s: metadata
  • Labels:
    None
  • Environment:
    Eclipse Indigo SR1 (3.7.1) Linux x86_64 jdk1.6.0_29.x64

Description

Four methods in NumberRange fail to compile in Eclipse Indigo SR1 (3.7.1) (eclipse-jee-indigo-SR1-linux-gtk-x86_64). They compile fine in javac in jdk1.6.0_29.x64 and in Eclipse Helios SR2 (eclipse-jee-helios-SR2-linux-gtk-x86_64).

The method containsNC(Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Comparable) NumberRange.java /gt-metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util line 477 Java Problem

The method containsNC(Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Range<capture#33-of ?>) NumberRange.java /gt-metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util line 495 Java Problem

The method intersectsNC(Range<? extends Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Range<capture#41-of ?>) NumberRange.java /gt-metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util line 512 Java Problem

The method unionNC(Range<? extends Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Range<capture#49-of ?>) NumberRange.java /gt-metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util line 524 Java Problem

  1. Java Source File
    NumberRange.java
    08/Dec/11 9:15 PM
    0.3 kB
    Ben Caradoc-Davies
  2. Java Source File
    Range.java
    08/Dec/11 9:15 PM
    0.1 kB
    Ben Caradoc-Davies

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Jody reports that this failure does not occur under 3.7.0. Ben to confirm. (And thanks Jody for fixing the description markup!)
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Jody reports that this failure does not occur under 3.7.0. Ben to confirm. (And thanks Jody for fixing the description markup!)
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
I can confirm that this behaviour does *not* occur in Indigo R (3.7.0). The failure is also seen in Juno M3 (4.2 [identifies itself as 4.1]).
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - I can confirm that this behaviour does *not* occur in Indigo R (3.7.0). The failure is also seen in Juno M3 (4.2 [identifies itself as 4.1]).
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Attached simplified files that demonstrate the failure. These compile with javac from jdk1.6.0_29.x64 and jdk1.7.0_01.x64 but not with Eclipse Indigo SR1 or later.
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Attached simplified files that demonstrate the failure. These compile with javac from jdk1.6.0_29.x64 and jdk1.7.0_01.x64 but not with Eclipse Indigo SR1 or later.
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - - edited
The failure for this example is:

The method containsNC(Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Comparable)
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - - edited The failure for this example is: The method containsNC(Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>) in the type Range<Number&Comparable<? super Number&Comparable<? super N>>> is not applicable for the arguments (Comparable)
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Reported upstream:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366131
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Reported upstream: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366131
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Fixed upstream. Not yet in a released Eclipse. Workaround is to roll back to Indigo R (3.7.0).
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Fixed upstream. Not yet in a released Eclipse. Workaround is to roll back to Indigo R (3.7.0).
Hide
Permalink
Andrea Aime added a comment -
So, shall we close this one as "not a bug"?
Show
Andrea Aime added a comment - So, shall we close this one as "not a bug"?
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Can we wait until a working Eclipse 3.7.2 (Indigo SR2) is released?
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Can we wait until a working Eclipse 3.7.2 (Indigo SR2) is released?
Hide
Permalink
Andrea Aime added a comment -
No problem on my side
Show
Andrea Aime added a comment - No problem on my side
Hide
Permalink
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment -
Confirmed fixed in Eclipse Indigo SR2 (3.7.2). Note that Justin also worked around this in GEOT-4038 by modifying the code.
Show
Ben Caradoc-Davies added a comment - Confirmed fixed in Eclipse Indigo SR2 (3.7.2). Note that Justin also worked around this in GEOT-4038 by modifying the code.

People

  • Assignee:
    Jody Garnett
    Reporter:
    Ben Caradoc-Davies
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: