GeoTools
  1. GeoTools
  2. GEOT-3306

Vendor option "autoRotate" to automatically rotate labels that won't fit with horizonal orientation

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.7-M4
    • Fix Version/s: 2.7-RC2
    • Component/s: render
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The purpose of this feature is to fit more labels onto a polygon layer with lots of different sized polygons (like parcels)

      1. autoRotate_mbr_r36322.diff
        5 kB
        Björn Harrtell
      2. autoRotate_r36309.diff
        4 kB
        Björn Harrtell
      3. GEOS-3306-rotate-on-need.patch
        15 kB
        Andrea Aime
      4. GEOT-3306-alignfixes.patch
        12 kB
        Andrea Aime
      5. GEOT-3306-rotate-on-need-enum3.patch
        15 kB
        Björn Harrtell
      6. GEOT-3306-rotate-on-need-enum3-2.6.x-backport.patch
        16 kB
        Björn Harrtell
      7. polygonAlign2_trunk_r36322.diff
        6 kB
        Björn Harrtell
      1. alignBBox.png
        166 kB
      2. moreAlignTweaksBuildings-nq8.png
        90 kB
      3. moreAlignTweaks-nq8.png
        86 kB
      4. oddlabels.png
        78 kB
      5. ortho.png
        143 kB
      6. statesalign.png
        97 kB

        Activity

        Hide
        Andrea Aime added a comment -
        I guess that in order to get what you want you should also increase the GoodnessOfFit towards 0.9 or 1, that's what I did to get the results in the screenshots above
        Show
        Andrea Aime added a comment - I guess that in order to get what you want you should also increase the GoodnessOfFit towards 0.9 or 1, that's what I did to get the results in the screenshots above
        Hide
        Andrea Aime added a comment -
        I guess that in order to get what you want you should also increase the GoodnessOfFit towards 0.9 or 1, that's what I did to get the results in the screenshots above
        Show
        Andrea Aime added a comment - I guess that in order to get what you want you should also increase the GoodnessOfFit towards 0.9 or 1, that's what I did to get the results in the screenshots above
        Hide
        Andrea Aime added a comment -
        Btw, yesterday I wrote a quick blog about this that is now published: http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/2010/11/geoserver-tips-tricks-auto-alignement.html
        Show
        Andrea Aime added a comment - Btw, yesterday I wrote a quick blog about this that is now published: http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/2010/11/geoserver-tips-tricks-auto-alignement.html
        Hide
        Björn Harrtell added a comment -
        Ah yes I had GoodnessOfFit=0. Now using GoodnessOfFit=1 and getting really nice results.
        Show
        Björn Harrtell added a comment - Ah yes I had GoodnessOfFit=0. Now using GoodnessOfFit=1 and getting really nice results.
        Hide
        Andrea Aime added a comment -
        Mass closing all issues that have been in "resolved" state for more than one month without further comments
        Show
        Andrea Aime added a comment - Mass closing all issues that have been in "resolved" state for more than one month without further comments

          People

          • Assignee:
            Andrea Aime
            Reporter:
            Björn Harrtell
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: