Details
Description
This issue is meant to track discussion about the FeatureAccess super class for DataStore proposal.
This proposal overpasses the failed GEOT-1063 proposal
This issue is meant to track discussion about the FeatureAccess super class for DataStore proposal.
This proposal overpasses the failed GEOT-1063 proposal
1)
>FeatureAccess name must be killed, it's too easy to mistake it as part
> of the FeatureSource, FeatureSource, FeatureLocking familiy.
> ComplexDataStore may not sound nice, but it's at least consistent
> with the other names you're coming up with.
2)
get rid of lock/unlockFeatures(Query), let only Filter "
3)
exemplify the three approaches brought on the mailing list