|
Discussion during today IRC meeting:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2007/03/19/IRC+Meeting+-+19+March+2007 Wrote up suggestion from Andrea: -org.geotools.filter.text -org.geotools.filter.xml.v1_0 -org.geotools.filter.text.v1_1 -org.geotools.geometry.text -org.geotools.geometry.xml.v2 -org.geotools.geometry.xml.v3 Asked for justins review - switched to the "version" slot being an indication of SPECIFICATION
-org.geotools.filter.text -org.geotools.filter.xml.filter1_0 -org.geotools.filter.text.filter1_1 -org.geotools.geometry.text -org.geotools.geometry.xml.gml2 -org.geotools.geometry.xml.gml3 Which at least puts gml2 and gml3 back in the picture. Sent it off for review and vote :-D |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
+1 on the xml packing naming structure. One question though is how to do versions. Shall the version number just be tacked onto the end. Examples being:
org.geotools.xml.filter.v1_0
org.geotools.xml.filter.v1_1
org.geotools.xml.gml.v2
org.geotools.xml.gml.v3
Or shall the version be incorporated in one level up like:
org.geotools.xml.filter1_0
org.geotools.xml.filter1_1
org.geotools.xml.gml2
org.geotools.xml.gml3