Details
Description
For the past couple of months the 1.7.x branch has been outputing WMS getcapabilities responses with duplicate layers, one with the namespace prefix and one without.
I skimmed through the specs and concluded that this is techically correct, but it will probably confuse a lot of clients. Should we go back to the old behvavior, only report layers with their namespaces?
nope, i would definitely say this is a regression... fixed now back to normal behavior.