GeoServer

Time parameter in WMS, and the way to parse ISO date

Details

  • Type: Task Task
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Minor Minor
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 1.6.0-beta4
  • Component/s: WMS
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    3

Description

For the WMS GetMap request, the time parameter is parsed as an Integer value.
Attached to this task, you could find a class that allows parsing of this parameter, and provides a way to parse Date as in the ISO format.

  1. Text File
    diff_wms.txt
    09/Oct/07 5:43 AM
    19 kB
    Cédric Briançon
  2. Java Source File
    TimeKvpParser.java
    08/Oct/07 8:51 AM
    7 kB
    Cédric Briançon
  3. Java Source File
    TimeKvpParserTest.java
    09/Oct/07 6:00 AM
    3 kB
    Cédric Briançon

Issue Links

is duplicated by

Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. GEOS-1351 Properly parse TIME parameter

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Cédric Briançon added a comment -

I attach a "svn diff" file that I did on my wms local version.
In it, there is the way I manage to get "time", "elevation" and "dim_range" parameters.

Show
Cédric Briançon added a comment - I attach a "svn diff" file that I did on my wms local version. In it, there is the way I manage to get "time", "elevation" and "dim_range" parameters.
Hide
Permalink
Cédric Briançon added a comment -

The test class

Show
Cédric Briançon added a comment - The test class
Hide
Permalink
Andrea Aime added a comment -

Fixed on trunk. DIM_RANGE part and capabilities part not applied, the first because it's a vendor parameter I'd like to discuss on the ml, the second because it refers to the PostGrid class which we don't have.

Show
Andrea Aime added a comment - Fixed on trunk. DIM_RANGE part and capabilities part not applied, the first because it's a vendor parameter I'd like to discuss on the ml, the second because it refers to the PostGrid class which we don't have.

People

  • Assignee:
    Andrea Aime
    Reporter:
    Cédric Briançon
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: