GeoAPI
  1. GeoAPI
  2. GEO-60

Non-existent constants referenced in the documentation

    Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0
    • Fix Version/s: 2.2-M1
    • Component/s: feature
    • Labels:
      None
    • Number of attachments :
      0

      Description

      The following constants are referenced in FeatureCollection javadoc:

      • LockRequest.TRANSACTION_LOCK
      • LockReponse.TRANSACTION_LOCKRESPONSE
      • LockReponse.PENDING

      Those comments do not exist in GeoAPI at this time. They were defined in Geotools, from which the GeoAPI interfaces were derived.

      Either we ommit those references from the javadoc, or either we add those constants in the API.

        Activity

        Hide
        Jody Garnett added a comment -

        We do not have a LockResponse in GeoTools - I think the references are against GeoAPI 2.0?

        Show
        Jody Garnett added a comment - We do not have a LockResponse in GeoTools - I think the references are against GeoAPI 2.0?
        Hide
        Martin Desruisseaux added a comment -

        I believe that the FeatureCollection interface has been removed, so this task is not an issue anymore? Jody can you confirm please, and if so close this task?

        Show
        Martin Desruisseaux added a comment - I believe that the FeatureCollection interface has been removed, so this task is not an issue anymore? Jody can you confirm please, and if so close this task?
        Hide
        Jody Garnett added a comment -

        That is correct; FeatureCollection has been removed (as it was not supported by the ISO 19107 specification). It is still a great idea and should make an appearance as a data access concern; possibly with the return of the org.opengis.data package?

        Show
        Jody Garnett added a comment - That is correct; FeatureCollection has been removed (as it was not supported by the ISO 19107 specification). It is still a great idea and should make an appearance as a data access concern; possibly with the return of the org.opengis.data package?

          People

          • Assignee:
            Jody Garnett
            Reporter:
            Martin Desruisseaux
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Time Tracking

              Estimated:
              Original Estimate - 2 hours
              2h
              Remaining:
              Remaining Estimate - 2 hours
              2h
              Logged:
              Time Spent - Not Specified
              Not Specified