Continuum
  1. Continuum
  2. CONTINUUM-1388

the NOTICE file is overzealous in declaring dependencies

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.1-beta-2
    • Fix Version/s: 1.1-beta-4
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Complexity:
      Intermediate
    • Number of attachments :
      0

      Description

      we only need to say, for example, software developed by the ASF once, and all the unnamed ones don't need to be there.

      This might require fixes in the remote reosurces plugin and an update.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Emmanuel Venisse added a comment -

          Why do you want to remove unnamed software? With the groupId aded in the NOTICE file, user can retrieve the names and check licenses

          We can use this format:

          This product includes/uses software(s) developped by the ASF (www.apache.org)
          -soft1 (url1)
          -soft2 (url2)
          ...

          This product includes/uses software(s) developped by Codehaus (www.codehaus.org)
          -soft3 (url3)
          -soft4 (url4)
          ...

          Show
          Emmanuel Venisse added a comment - Why do you want to remove unnamed software? With the groupId aded in the NOTICE file, user can retrieve the names and check licenses We can use this format: This product includes/uses software(s) developped by the ASF (www.apache.org) -soft1 (url1) -soft2 (url2) ... This product includes/uses software(s) developped by Codehaus (www.codehaus.org) -soft3 (url3) -soft4 (url4) ...
          Hide
          Brett Porter added a comment -

          that'd be good, though I think it's only necessary to list each org once - would need to check.

          Certainly, we currently have "developed by ASF" at the top as a blanket, and then list a whole lot of ASF software that doesn't need to be.

          Show
          Brett Porter added a comment - that'd be good, though I think it's only necessary to list each org once - would need to check. Certainly, we currently have "developed by ASF" at the top as a blanket, and then list a whole lot of ASF software that doesn't need to be.
          Hide
          Emmanuel Venisse added a comment -

          Fixed in remote resources plugin and in the bundle. Waiting for the release of them now, the release process is started by dkulp

          Show
          Emmanuel Venisse added a comment - Fixed in remote resources plugin and in the bundle. Waiting for the release of them now, the release process is started by dkulp
          Hide
          Olivier Lamy added a comment -

          update to last remote resources plugin in rev 587409

          Show
          Olivier Lamy added a comment - update to last remote resources plugin in rev 587409

            People

            • Assignee:
              Olivier Lamy
              Reporter:
              Brett Porter
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: