Details

    • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.0.3
    • Fix Version/s: 1.1 M1
    • Component/s: XML tests
    • Labels:
      None
    • Number of attachments :
      2

      Description

      There is a desire to move away from the test framework's use of the ANT JavaCC compiler task for compiling the output of the source generation. JCI is one alternative. To use JCI, we'd need to use one of the implemented compilers, groovy, janino, or eclipse. Is the Eclipse compiler the one that would be preferred? (Interestingly, I don't obviously see a way with JCI to use the Sun Java javac compiler, but I've only looked at it for a couple minutes so far.

      There are no public releases of JCI yet.

      I haven't marked a "fix version" for this issue as I'm not sure when this work can successfully be targeted. But by creating an issue at least there's an area to track investigations, disucssion, and resolution.

      1. patch-C1603-20061106.txt
        22 kB
        Ralf Joachim
      2. patch-C1603-20061113.txt
        28 kB
        Ralf Joachim

        Activity

        Hide
        Edward Kuns added a comment -

        Unassigning. If someone else wants to take this up, go for it! Otherwise I'll get to it at some point.

        Show
        Edward Kuns added a comment - Unassigning. If someone else wants to take this up, go for it! Otherwise I'll get to it at some point.
        Hide
        Ralf Joachim added a comment -

        Inital patch for review. How do you think about removing AntJavaCompiler?

        Show
        Ralf Joachim added a comment - Inital patch for review. How do you think about removing AntJavaCompiler?
        Hide
        Edward Kuns added a comment -

        Looks good to me. I have no complaint about removing AntJavaCompiler. If we ever had a need for it, source control would be our friend. I can't think of any special reason to keep it around.

        Be interesting to see if either compiler framework is faster than the other.

        Show
        Edward Kuns added a comment - Looks good to me. I have no complaint about removing AntJavaCompiler. If we ever had a need for it, source control would be our friend. I can't think of any special reason to keep it around. Be interesting to see if either compiler framework is faster than the other.
        Hide
        Werner Guttmann added a comment -

        Guys, I think we have to have a longer discussion on this one ... as I learned a few things whilst being in Munich yesterday. I have not looked at the patch yet, but I think we unfortunately have to talk about a few issues related to this ... ;-(.

        Show
        Werner Guttmann added a comment - Guys, I think we have to have a longer discussion on this one ... as I learned a few things whilst being in Munich yesterday. I have not looked at the patch yet, but I think we unfortunately have to talk about a few issues related to this ... ;-(.
        Hide
        Ralf Joachim added a comment -

        Final patch

        Show
        Ralf Joachim added a comment - Final patch

          People

          • Assignee:
            Ralf Joachim
            Reporter:
            Edward Kuns
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: