castor

Thorough JavaDoc generation complaint cleanup part II

Details

  • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Minor Minor
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 1.0.3
  • Fix Version/s: 1.0.4
  • Component/s: General
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    1

Description

I wonder why sometimes my "svn diff" patches don't apply well for y'all. Here is a patch containing only those parts that failed when you applied the bigger patch. This one is small enough that if parts fail, it would be trivial to do by hand.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Werner Guttmann added a comment -

Thanks, Edward. Wrt. the patch application 'issue', Ralf is wondering whether the output as generated by the SVN command line client is somehow 'spoofed' .. .

Show
Werner Guttmann added a comment - Thanks, Edward. Wrt. the patch application 'issue', Ralf is wondering whether the output as generated by the SVN command line client is somehow 'spoofed' .. .
Hide
Permalink
Werner Guttmann added a comment -

Funny enough, I had to apply the patch completely manually .... .

Show
Werner Guttmann added a comment - Funny enough, I had to apply the patch completely manually .... .
Hide
Permalink
Edward Kuns added a comment -

I'm not surprised, as those were the parts that failed before. But now we have a definite example for the subclipse folks.

Show
Edward Kuns added a comment - I'm not surprised, as those were the parts that failed before. But now we have a definite example for the subclipse folks.
Hide
Permalink
Ralf Joachim added a comment -

No we don't have the example as Werner have applied the patch by hand and commited it. So we don't have the unmodified source any more and are not able to test wether a subclipse patch would have caused the same problems. I think we should take care to amke more tests and save any information that may help to track the problem.

Show
Ralf Joachim added a comment - No we don't have the example as Werner have applied the patch by hand and commited it. So we don't have the unmodified source any more and are not able to test wether a subclipse patch would have caused the same problems. I think we should take care to amke more tests and save any information that may help to track the problem.
Hide
Permalink
Werner Guttmann added a comment -

You can always check out a previous release ....

Show
Werner Guttmann added a comment - You can always check out a previous release ....

People

  • Assignee:
    Werner Guttmann
    Reporter:
    Edward Kuns
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: