[#BOO-742] Current Generic support breaks name resolution

Boo

Current Generic support breaks name resolution

Created: 26/Jun/06 05:08 AM Updated: 07/Apr/07 07:41 AM

Component/s:

Compiler

Affects Version/s:

0.7.6

Fix Version/s:

0.7.7

Time Tracking:

Not Specified

Environment:

boo-0.7.6.2299, .net 2.0

Description

« Hide

The following code:

foo.boo

import System.Collections
import System.Collections.Generic

def foo() as IEnumerable:
  yield 1
  yield 2
  yield 3

Reports BCE0004: Ambiguous reference 'IEnumerable': System.Collections.IEnumerable, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable.

All

Comments

Work Log

Change History

Sort Order:

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Avishay Lavie added a comment - 08/Feb/07 05:11 PM

We need some different syntax to reference generic type definitions. C# has IEnumerable<> and IDictionary<,>, which is kinda ugly but distinguishes them from the non-generic IEnumerable and IDictionary. We need something similar so that a name without generic arguments will never be interpreted as a generic definition.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Avishay Lavie added a comment - 06/Apr/07 08:42 AM

This is becoming more and more bug-prone. I'd like to take over this issue. Is it OK with you, bamboo?

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Rodrigo B. de Oliveira added a comment - 06/Apr/07 09:22 AM

Thanks Avish.

[ Permalink | « Hide ]

Avishay Lavie added a comment - 07/Apr/07 07:41 AM

Resolved in 2447.
References containing generic parameters only match generic types, and references that don't only match non-generic types. To reference a generic type definition, the "Type of *" or "Type[of *, *]" syntax can be used.