Boo

Attack of the missing members in code completion!

Details

  • Type: Bug Bug
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Won't Fix
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 0.7
  • Component/s: #develop addin
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

BooBinding appears not to correctly parse and display certain members of primitives.

The following code-slice produces identical output as if z were an object rather than an integer.

(1 as int). <---code completion invoked.

Standard members such as int.parse, int.MaxValue, int.MinValue, the typical stuff, are missing.

So far I have only noticed this behavior exhibited in primitive types like int, decimel, etc.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Grunwald added a comment -

int.Parse, int.MaxValue, int.MinValue are static; so they shouldn't be called on 'instances' of int.
Instance members of int (CompareTo) work fine for me.

Show
Daniel Grunwald added a comment - int.Parse, int.MaxValue, int.MinValue are static; so they shouldn't be called on 'instances' of int. Instance members of int (CompareTo) work fine for me.
Hide
Permalink
Arron Washington added a comment -

The irony is, I used to know that sort of thing off the top of my head.

Entirely my fault; thanks.

Show
Arron Washington added a comment - The irony is, I used to know that sort of thing off the top of my head. Entirely my fault; thanks.
Hide
Permalink
Rodrigo B. de Oliveira added a comment -

Another related issue is that "as" should only be used with reference types.

Show
Rodrigo B. de Oliveira added a comment - Another related issue is that "as" should only be used with reference types.
Hide
Permalink
Arron Washington added a comment -

I know.

I only did it for instant code completion - using (var as object) brings up instanteous code completion, where as if I do something like,

var = 1
var. ....

code completion won't activate if I just typed those lines a few moments ago, so its often used as a technique to quickly get the members of a varaible type.

Crucify me why don't you.

Show
Arron Washington added a comment - I know. I only did it for instant code completion - using (var as object) brings up instanteous code completion, where as if I do something like, var = 1 var. .... code completion won't activate if I just typed those lines a few moments ago, so its often used as a technique to quickly get the members of a varaible type. Crucify me why don't you.

People

  • Assignee:
    Unassigned
    Reporter:
    Arron Washington
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: