Activiti
  1. Activiti
  2. ACT-1847

CLONE - Add process variable declarations

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Resolved Resolved
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 5.15
    • Component/s: Engine
    • Labels:
      None
    • Number of attachments :
      12

      Description

      I believe a lot of the capabilities are already implemented. Might just be a matter of looking up the undocumented feature in the code and add some testing.

      http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?t=1072&p=4345#p4345

      1. 515 snapshot Data Object addition v2.1.patch
        101 kB
        Lori Small
      2. Adding Data Objects and extension objects to Activiti v2.0.docx
        552 kB
        Lori Small
      3. Adding Data Objects and extension objects to Activiti v3.1.docx
        170 kB
        Lori Small
      4. Extending Activiti Designer.docx
        282 kB
        Lori Small
      5. org.activiti.designer.gui_2_17_14.patch
        27 kB
        Lori Small
      6. org.activiti.designer.gui_2_28_14.patch
        2 kB
        Lori Small
      1. Data Object class diagram.jpg
        79 kB
      2. Data Object XML schema.jpg
        130 kB

        Activity

        Hide
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment -

        Thanks for all the work being done. After analysis of the patches and approaches we decided to include the V2.1 patch (except for the modeler changes). This means we have a first version of support for data objects in Activiti 5.15. The Designer patch will be applied as well (a bit later). Thanks again!

        Show
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment - Thanks for all the work being done. After analysis of the patches and approaches we decided to include the V2.1 patch (except for the modeler changes). This means we have a first version of support for data objects in Activiti 5.15. The Designer patch will be applied as well (a bit later). Thanks again!
        Hide
        Lori Small added a comment -

        I tested it with our build and Modeler changes and everything looks good. Would you like me to open 2 separate JIRA issues (one for Modeler and one for Designer), so you can close this one?

        Show
        Lori Small added a comment - I tested it with our build and Modeler changes and everything looks good. Would you like me to open 2 separate JIRA issues (one for Modeler and one for Designer), so you can close this one?
        Hide
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment -

        Great, yes if you could create separate issues that would be nice. Then we can close this one. Thanks!

        Show
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment - Great, yes if you could create separate issues that would be nice. Then we can close this one. Thanks!
        Hide
        Lori Small added a comment - - edited

        Opened ACT-1963 for Modeler extensions and ACT-1964 for Designer extensions. I also found an new bug that I missed during integration, so I opened ACT-1965 to address it. I think you can go ahead and close this issue now. Thanks again for all your support!

        Show
        Lori Small added a comment - - edited Opened ACT-1963 for Modeler extensions and ACT-1964 for Designer extensions. I also found an new bug that I missed during integration, so I opened ACT-1965 to address it. I think you can go ahead and close this issue now. Thanks again for all your support!
        Hide
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment -

        Thanks Lori

        Show
        Tijs Rademakers added a comment - Thanks Lori

          People

          • Assignee:
            Tijs Rademakers
            Reporter:
            Lori Small
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: