Activiti

Add support for catching intermediate message events

Details

  • Type: New Feature New Feature
  • Status: Resolved Resolved
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 5.10
  • Component/s: Engine
  • Labels:
    None
  • Number of attachments :
    0

Description

The event subscription infrastructure introduced in activiti 5.9 should be expressive enough to add support for catching intermediate message events.

AT:

  • catching intermediate & boundary message events can be parsed correctly
  • there is an API method which allows to signal to activiti that a message has been received.
  • message correlation is performed "outside" of activiti
  • there is a query method which allows to query for executions which have subscribed to a particular message event.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment -

Should we do message boundary events in this issue as well or create a seperate issue for that?

Show
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment - Should we do message boundary events in this issue as well or create a seperate issue for that?
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment -

I changed the scope of this issue, since the implementation would be very similar.

Show
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment - I changed the scope of this issue, since the implementation would be very similar.
Hide
Permalink
Rene Gielen added a comment -

Is there a chance that this feature might be scheduled for 5.10?

Show
Rene Gielen added a comment - Is there a chance that this feature might be scheduled for 5.10?
Hide
Permalink
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment -

Hi Rene.

You can always go for enterprise support if you want to speed up implementation But currently I think it is pretty likely that it makes it into 5.10, but I cannot yet promise.

Cheers
Bernd

Show
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment - Hi Rene. You can always go for enterprise support if you want to speed up implementation But currently I think it is pretty likely that it makes it into 5.10, but I cannot yet promise. Cheers Bernd
Hide
Permalink
Rene Gielen added a comment -

Thanks for the info, Bernd. Plug taken into consideration

Show
Rene Gielen added a comment - Thanks for the info, Bernd. Plug taken into consideration
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment -

Support for intermediate catching message event added in
http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/activiti/?cs=3466

Show
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment - Support for intermediate catching message event added in http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/activiti/?cs=3466
Hide
Permalink
Sebastian Schneider added a comment -

I am unsure about the status of this issue. Does your comment mean that support for intermediate messages events has been introduced with the commit yoou mentioned but not for boundary message events, Daniel?

Show
Sebastian Schneider added a comment - I am unsure about the status of this issue. Does your comment mean that support for intermediate messages events has been introduced with the commit yoou mentioned but not for boundary message events, Daniel?
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment -

this issue is still in progress since message boundary events are not yet supported.

Show
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment - this issue is still in progress since message boundary events are not yet supported.
Hide
Permalink
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment -

Should we maybe fix this issue for 5.10 and reopen a new one with leftovers?

Show
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment - Should we maybe fix this issue for 5.10 and reopen a new one with leftovers?
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment -

sounds reasonable

Show
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment - sounds reasonable
Hide
Permalink
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment -

Could you maybe add the issue if you know what is still open? But not a pressing issue, we maybe could still do that when it pops up again

Show
Bernd Ruecker (camunda) added a comment - Could you maybe add the issue if you know what is still open? But not a pressing issue, we maybe could still do that when it pops up again
Hide
Permalink
Sebastian Schneider added a comment -

It's not clear from the release notes if message boundary events are supported or not. It seems they are not. Where is the issue for this "leftover"?

Show
Sebastian Schneider added a comment - It's not clear from the release notes if message boundary events are supported or not. It seems they are not. Where is the issue for this "leftover"?
Hide
Permalink
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment -

There you go:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-1366

Show
Daniel Meyer (camunda) added a comment - There you go: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-1366

People

  • Assignee:
    Daniel Meyer (camunda)
    Reporter:
    Daniel Meyer (camunda)
Vote (3)
Watch (5)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: